yeah. i’m evil.
or realllly camp :D

hullo. i guess this is the most uniform way to start a blog. either that or “hakuna matata”
well. i’ll go off-topic all the time. i am sorry. if it annoys you, do not follow me :D
or if you are hannah…..follow me ALL the time :P

i am extremely extremely annoyed at doctor who. most of the events could be explained by big bang II and the cracks in time. what couldn’t be explained is how PLASTIC rory knew about REAL rory’s death.
it’s impossible….the memory imprint was taken from the house. they had not visited the house since rory’s death, thus the house could hold no memory of it. yet he mentions dying. this….is a really annoying hole in an otherwise absurd and brilliant plot!

in case you don’t know me….if you are one of those lucky people; i write poetry (of sorts)…..ideas….i can do really well, REALLY well. i have the best ideas everrrr. however, i sometimes enable these ideas to turn into the biggest pile of england footballing you have ever seen!

feel free to comment on the things that are wrong. i really do need it. because if i don’t know what is wrong i can’t change it.

for a taster:
Like roses for a lover he slices and chops through lines of men,
the spears a thorn in his side,
the shields an overzealous stalk.
but again, his giant scissor hands can only slice and chop and chop and slice, for this is all they were meant to do,
no point in much else.

but then again, cooperation is a consideration,
but no man can argue with a fool,
no man can produce beauty and scarlet in idle chatter,
there is no honour in a parchment and ink,
and in the rawness of battle he would please any lover

imagine if the smoke arose from those tar ridden hills,
they could not, for if they did, he would shimmer,
ghostly amongst the soon to be dead,
this is the life he choose,
serving an idle king was not the dream he had in mind,
so now he cuts through scarlet cloth,
with scarlet flowers in mind
with scarlet thoughts on his mind,
thinking of his lover, dressed in a silken scarlet,
making scarlet love as he spins and swathes with a scimitar draped in scarlet,
but there is no anger.
none.

but take heed.
those scarlet stripes he had in mind,
which jump between bands of ash and shining metal,
come more frequently
as the bandage he wraps around his arm grows heavier,
on his own, he brings down fifty seven knights.
yet again he uses his two handed sword to make love,

and in a field above his head, his lover finds him,
draped in scarlet robes, from head to foot,
a noble royal.
and they make love,
on a bed of scarlet moss,
soft and wet to the touch,
kissing the copper of their hands
entwining red copper limbs,
and five years later than that red-curtained night
she loses her virginity,
and the moss turned a prettier red than scarlet.

i know a lot of it is bad. but that’s the point of critique ;)

i know this is a long post. i am sorry

my views on religion-i myself am an atheist. not through ignorance if you believe in god, and not because “it’s just obvious” if you are an atheist.
in order for you to state your views on religion, i think you have to know about the points for and against your decision, and be able to contribute to a debate for BOTH sides. don’t just take your stance and stick with it.
i heard in an argument the other day two things put forwards by ignorant atheists….or idiots if i may call them that. the first-that anyone with intelligence can see that science explains the universe and removes the necessity to create false gods to pin misunderstanding on. THIS IS ABSOLUTE CODSWALLOP. the majority of the world’s scientists throughout history and today believe in GOD. science explains the HOW. religion explains the WHY.
secondly- someone said that how can God love humanity if he lets murderers live, controls their lives, and controls everybody else’s lives. and how can there be point to life if god controls everything. AGAIN. most people believe that god just knows what happens because he exists through all time and all places. this does not mean he controls everything. You know what happened in the past. but this does not mean you can influence it any more than a fly can influence how the sun burns.

there are MANY more arguments by ignorant parties on both sides. but SCIENCE DOES NOT DISPROVE RELIGION. NOR DOES RELIGION DISPROVE SCIENCE.

hmmmm
yeah

again. ROAR. i’ll post again shortly, unless i forget, in which case, i won’t be disappointing many people. but erm. CIAO :D